Democrats are progressives. They believe in the perfectibility of man. They believe that man perfects himself in the historical process through conflict and punishment. They repudiate the value of the individual. They see human value only in groups. They are dismissive of individual character.
They repudiate the notion of due process and the presumption of innocence of the accused. They stand against every major advance of the enlightenment. They believe the fundamental existential truth of the universe is the punishment of man into submission. They hate me as an individual. I know this because they have said so. They hate me because I am old, white, Christian, and male. They hate me because I stand for the well established notion of the modern nation state which was created in the wake of the 1648 treaty of Westphalia. They hate me because I actually have read history. They hate me because I reject rationalism. They hate me because I embrace empiricism. They hate me because I believe that authority should be observed not alleged. They hate me because I believe that none of mankind are endowed with a right to dominion, and none are endowed with an obligation of servitude. They hate me because I can identify their fundamental political view which is neofacism. They hate me because I have identified their obsessive desire for political power as a social-sexual personality disorder related to sadomasochism. They are the true jack booted, high stepping brown shirts of our day. Should they ever come to complete power, I will be among the first they will hang from a meat hook and beat with a rubber hose.
Thursday, November 15, 2018
Thursday, September 13, 2018
The Ideology of Progressivism
Progressives stand alone in our time as the greatest bastion of ignorance that has ever existed throughout the history of man. The vast majority of progressives have no idea as to the sources of their own ideology.
The German idealist philosopher Fichte produced the so-called Hegelian historical dialectic in the years before the French revolution and the terror of 1794. The basic idea was that every society has a weltenshauung (world and life view), and that this weltenshauung was the thesis of the society. This thesis would cause a rise in an antithesis in a competing civilization. These two conflicting world and life views would come into violent opposition and what would emerge would be a synthesis. The synthesis would be different from both the thesis and the antithesis but would merge elements of both. The synthesis would become a new thesis in the history of man which would cause an antithesis to arise and another conflict to ensue producing yet another synthesis.
In this manner thesis + antithesis = synthesis and that this was the inevitable pattern of human history as man forever advanced until utopia was achieved. The view was that man becomes better and better everyday in every way until he succeeds in perfecting himself within history.
Hegel picked up this idea of Fichte and wrote a number of works in which he put this theory into practice. In this manner the theory came to be known as the Hegelian historical dialectic. The philosopher who followed Hegel and became an intermediate figure between Hegel and Marx was Feuerbach. Feuerbach's contribution to the discussion was a radical repudiation of the value of the individual. Feuerbach read the parables of the lost in the New Testament and he took the position that the New Testament advanced the idea of egoistic individualism. Feuerbach rejected what he saw as egoistic individualism and repudiated the idea of value resident in individuals. After Feuerbach all progressives repudiated the idea of value in individuals. Value was only resident in groups. All of the great fascists of the twentieth century including Hitler, Mussolini, and Roosevelt were avowed progressives.
Progressives believe that the fundamental existential truth of the universe is the punishment of man into submission. Man is seen as a perfectible being who can be redeemed through the imposition of
punishments. These punishments are imposed by the state. In this manner man redeems himself.
The writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States subscribed to a totally different set of ideas. In the first instance they subscribed to the view that man is not perfectible. This lack of perfection is the driving force behind the idea of the separation of powers.
They believed that when powers were combined in one person, or any subset of all persons, that government would act in loco deus. For these reasons they also constructed the Constitution as document of enumerated powers rather than a document of enumerated rights.
While the fascist powers were defeated in World War II, progressive thought and fascism survived and today is practiced by most powers in the world including the United States. Ironically the over reaching corruption of various departments of the US government (State, Justice, FBI, CIA etc.)
will not be punished for their criminal acts. The corruption found there is so deep and so broad that pursuing criminal cases would destroy the credibility of the US government for many decades. Instead, the wholesale violation of 4th Amendment rights of all those who were victims will undoubtedly precipitate an avalanche of civil suits breaking the perpetrators of public corruption and casting them into lives of poverty and squalor. While criminal prosecution of violation of human rights under the color of law has been done in the past, the real punishments have come in the form of settlements of civil suits.
The German idealist philosopher Fichte produced the so-called Hegelian historical dialectic in the years before the French revolution and the terror of 1794. The basic idea was that every society has a weltenshauung (world and life view), and that this weltenshauung was the thesis of the society. This thesis would cause a rise in an antithesis in a competing civilization. These two conflicting world and life views would come into violent opposition and what would emerge would be a synthesis. The synthesis would be different from both the thesis and the antithesis but would merge elements of both. The synthesis would become a new thesis in the history of man which would cause an antithesis to arise and another conflict to ensue producing yet another synthesis.
In this manner thesis + antithesis = synthesis and that this was the inevitable pattern of human history as man forever advanced until utopia was achieved. The view was that man becomes better and better everyday in every way until he succeeds in perfecting himself within history.
Hegel picked up this idea of Fichte and wrote a number of works in which he put this theory into practice. In this manner the theory came to be known as the Hegelian historical dialectic. The philosopher who followed Hegel and became an intermediate figure between Hegel and Marx was Feuerbach. Feuerbach's contribution to the discussion was a radical repudiation of the value of the individual. Feuerbach read the parables of the lost in the New Testament and he took the position that the New Testament advanced the idea of egoistic individualism. Feuerbach rejected what he saw as egoistic individualism and repudiated the idea of value resident in individuals. After Feuerbach all progressives repudiated the idea of value in individuals. Value was only resident in groups. All of the great fascists of the twentieth century including Hitler, Mussolini, and Roosevelt were avowed progressives.
Progressives believe that the fundamental existential truth of the universe is the punishment of man into submission. Man is seen as a perfectible being who can be redeemed through the imposition of
punishments. These punishments are imposed by the state. In this manner man redeems himself.
The writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States subscribed to a totally different set of ideas. In the first instance they subscribed to the view that man is not perfectible. This lack of perfection is the driving force behind the idea of the separation of powers.
They believed that when powers were combined in one person, or any subset of all persons, that government would act in loco deus. For these reasons they also constructed the Constitution as document of enumerated powers rather than a document of enumerated rights.
While the fascist powers were defeated in World War II, progressive thought and fascism survived and today is practiced by most powers in the world including the United States. Ironically the over reaching corruption of various departments of the US government (State, Justice, FBI, CIA etc.)
will not be punished for their criminal acts. The corruption found there is so deep and so broad that pursuing criminal cases would destroy the credibility of the US government for many decades. Instead, the wholesale violation of 4th Amendment rights of all those who were victims will undoubtedly precipitate an avalanche of civil suits breaking the perpetrators of public corruption and casting them into lives of poverty and squalor. While criminal prosecution of violation of human rights under the color of law has been done in the past, the real punishments have come in the form of settlements of civil suits.
Friday, August 17, 2018
THE FAILED PUTSCH OF 2017-18
The latest and best publication on the failed putsch of 2017-18 is The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme To Clear Hillary And Frame Donald Trump. In this landmark work Greg Jarrett lays out in great detail and with a mountain of notes the disgraceful scheme. The early exposure of some of the information is all that kept someone from wandering into a Washington, D.C. beer hall with a revolver, firing three shots into the ceiling while announcing that the US government is dissolved and 'I am in charge here now.' What remains to be discovered is the possible identity of the 'someone' who was supposed to complete the terrible deed.
Sunday, March 26, 2017
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYNDICATE
It has now become clear at some length that the NSA, CIA, and FBI do not report to the President of the United States. They are a law unto themselves, withholding information from the Chief Executive whenever it suits their political agendas. They have used their positions in a variety of felonious acts of sedition and treason.
How can the President deal with this threat to democratic representative and constitutional government? The procedure is very simple. The President should withdraw his proposed budget, add fifty percent cuts to the budgets of national intelligence agencies, and then resubmit his budget. He might also send along a message to the RINO’s and Dims that he will not sign a budget that does not incorporate these new cuts.
The intelligence agencies have richly earned the contempt of every American and an eventual complete elimination of these agencies of organized crime is inevitable. The National Intelligence Syndicate must have its teeth pulled. It is high time for them to be served the crap sandwich.
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
NEWS- DEEP STATE PLOTS TO KILL TRUMP
Trump said in his speech to the joint session of Congress that he would not represent the world, but that his job was to represent the people of the United States. Those were fighting words and almost immediately the deep state began considering a way forward. Under consideration are perpetrator recruitment issues. Who can be recruited to do this deed?
Currently under consideration is the Hinkley type scam. The idea is to recruit a loner who can be promised lifetime sex with his favorite actress. In Hollywood there is no shortage of women who would be willing participants. The loser in this scenario may be promised that it is unlikely that he would be caught, but that if he were caught he would be vigorously defended. Upon a verdict of not guilty be reason of insanity he would be assigned to a half way house with weekends off and three weeks of vacation every year.
The major advantage of this plot will be widespread support in the deep state. CIA, NSA, FBI, Secret Service, Treasury and State will supply support throughout the operation. The major disadvantage of this plan is that Trump may discover the plot and take measures to provide for his own security.
Another potential way forward is to have former Obama administration Attorneys General continually call for violence in the streets and hope that some loner will step forward and do the deed independently.
Saturday, February 18, 2017
THE DISARRAY OF MCCAIN'S MIND
The illegal release of enormous quantities of classified information gathered by US intelligence agencies in early days of the Trump administration has been astonishing to many Americans. But to this commentator it comes as no particular surprise. The Obama administration was generally characterized by fascist behavior in many respects. It routinely attacked the press and all those it perceived as political enemies. The many departments and agencies of the federal government were stacked with political operatives who shared the Obama contempt for the modern nation state generally and the United States in particular.
In the midst of what became a virtual intelligence coup d’etat many who have warned of intelligence gathering dangers have been vindicated. Rand Paul is among those heroes of the Republic who stood almost alone. Johnny McCain, the elderly RINO from Arizona, was a severe critic of the few who stood alongside Paul. But, in 2017 Johnny McCain can be forgiven for the disarray in his own mind.
Friday, February 10, 2017
MECCA
About:
MECCA is the Muslim Expulsion Coordinating Committees Association. It is an Advocacy Association with committees in all fifty states of the United States.
Advocacy:
The Association advocates the expulsion of all Muslims from the United States and from all other western countries.
Educational mission:
The Association educates the public through its committees on the nature of Islamic Supremacist ideology and its incompatibility with the values of western civilization. Western societies generally adhere to values which suggest that none are endowed with a right to dominion and none are endowed with an obligation of servitude.
Islamic theology explicitly denies these values and asserts an endowed right to dominion. This belief is apparent in the split between Sunni and Shiite Islam. Each side in the conflict asserts that it has an endowed right of dominion and the other has an endowed obligation of servitude. Each side believes that it has a moral obligation to impose dominion and require submission of the other. Each side believes that it has the moral obligation to kill all who refuse to accept an endowed obligation of servitude.
Further, this belief system denies the fundamental principle stated in the Declaration of Independence: “we hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal....” The expulsion of all Muslims from the United States is necessary to achieve one of the principle goals stated in the Preamble of the Constitution: “to ensure domestic tranquility....” The true Muslim has a moral obligation in his own view to kill all Americans who refuse to submit.
Action:
The committees of the Association engage in contacting members of Congress, calling radio talk shows, writing letters to editors of newspapers, providing speakers to public interest groups, and advocating that all Americans interested in defending themselves acquire suitable firearms, training, and concealed carry permits.
Speakers for public interest groups may be arranged by commenting on this post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
